1980 Mazda 929 vs. 2012 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2012 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac Escalade (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 320 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1549 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac Escalade (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 430 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 929 | 2012 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | 929 | Escalade |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 403 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 565 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 2619 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5639 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1892 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3302 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 117 L |