1980 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1946 Rover P2
To start off, 1980 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Rover P2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Rover P2 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1946 Rover P2. (47 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1946 Rover P2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Rover P2 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1980 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mazda Cosmo | 1946 Rover P2 | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | Cosmo | P2 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1577 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1420 kg |
