1980 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4
To start off, 1980 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 2,138 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 (104 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1980 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 75 kg more than 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda Cosmo | 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | Cosmo | Dove GTR4 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2138 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 53 L |