1980 Mazda RX-7 vs. 1959 Triumph TR3
To start off, 1980 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1980 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mazda RX-7 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1959 Triumph TR3. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph TR3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 135 kg more than 1959 Triumph TR3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mazda RX-7 | 1959 Triumph TR3 | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | RX-7 | TR3 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1959 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 29 L |
