1980 Mazda RX-7 vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 266 kg more than 1980 Mazda RX-7.
Because 1980 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mazda RX-7 | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | RX-7 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2568 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2680 mm |
