1980 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2004 Saturn L

To start off, 2004 Saturn L is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1980 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Saturn L (141 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1980 Mazda RX-7. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Saturn L weights approximately 316 kg more than 1980 Mazda RX-7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1980 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Saturn L, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Saturn L (203 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Saturn L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda RX-7.

Compare all specifications:

1980 Mazda RX-7 2004 Saturn L
Make Mazda Saturn
Model RX-7 L
Year Released 1980 2004
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2292 cc 2196 cc
Engine Type dual-disk rotary in-line
Horse Power 104 HP 141 HP
Torque 145 Nm 203 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1060 kg 1376 kg
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 4840 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1270 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 59 L