1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 (108 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 weights approximately 335 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 (170 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | 200 | 220 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.7:1 |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 45 L |