1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 vs. 2006 Nissan M
To start off, 2006 Nissan M is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan M is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan M, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan M (462 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200. (170 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200. 2006 Nissan M has automatic transmission and 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 has manual transmission. 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Nissan M will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 | 2006 Nissan M | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
| Model | 200 | M |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 462 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1830 mm |
