1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 vs. 2011 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2011 Nissan Pixo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 (108 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Pixo.
Because 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 | 2011 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
| Model | 200 | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 68 HP |
| Top Speed | 168 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.4 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2360 mm |
