1980 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1990 Holden Apollo
To start off, 1990 Holden Apollo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 135 kg more than 1990 Holden Apollo.
Because 1980 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1990 Holden Apollo has automatic transmission and 1980 Mercedes-Benz E has manual transmission. 1980 Mercedes-Benz E will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1990 Holden Apollo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mercedes-Benz E | 1990 Holden Apollo | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
| Model | E | Apollo |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1988 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2610 mm |
