1980 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2001 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2001 Lincoln LS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lincoln LS weights approximately 347 kg more than 1980 Mercedes-Benz E.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Lincoln LS has automatic transmission and 1980 Mercedes-Benz E has manual transmission. 1980 Mercedes-Benz E will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lincoln LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mercedes-Benz E | 2001 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Lincoln |
| Model | E | LS |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1988 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1687 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2910 mm |
