1980 Mercedes-Benz T vs. 2012 Ford Flex
To start off, 2012 Ford Flex is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercedes-Benz T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercedes-Benz T would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Flex weights approximately 678 kg more than 1980 Mercedes-Benz T.
Because 1980 Mercedes-Benz T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mercedes-Benz T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Ford Flex has automatic transmission and 1980 Mercedes-Benz T has manual transmission. 1980 Mercedes-Benz T will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford Flex will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mercedes-Benz T | 2012 Ford Flex | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
Model | T | Flex |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 262 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 2028 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5126 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1928 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2995 mm |