1980 Mercedes-Benz T vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercedes-Benz T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercedes-Benz T would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 805 kg more than 1980 Mercedes-Benz T.
Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mercedes-Benz T. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 1980 Mercedes-Benz T has manual transmission. 1980 Mercedes-Benz T will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mercedes-Benz T | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
| Model | T | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 2155 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4808 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1897 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1783 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2860 mm |
