1980 Mercury Cougar vs. 1964 Toyota Crown
To start off, 1980 Mercury Cougar is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mercury Cougar (90 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Crown. (80 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 60 kg more than 1964 Toyota Crown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mercury Cougar (164 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Toyota Crown. (145 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1980 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mercury Cougar | 1964 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Mercury | Toyota |
| Model | Cougar | Crown |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2301 cc | 1837 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 80 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2700 mm |
