1980 Mercury Cougar vs. 1970 Renault 4
To start off, 1980 Mercury Cougar is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Renault 4 would be higher. At 4,184 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mercury Cougar (116 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1970 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1970 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 760 kg more than 1970 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mercury Cougar | 1970 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Mercury | Renault |
| Model | Cougar | 4 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4184 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2410 mm |
