1980 Mercury Cougar vs. 1998 Seat Bolero
To start off, 1998 Seat Bolero is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Seat Bolero (350 HP) has 253 more horse power than 1980 Mercury Cougar. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Seat Bolero should accelerate faster than 1980 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1980 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Seat Bolero, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mercury Cougar | 1998 Seat Bolero | |
| Make | Mercury | Seat |
| Model | Cougar | Bolero |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3271 cc | 2799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 350 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
