1980 Mercury Lynx vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 370 kg more than 1980 Mercury Lynx.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mercury Lynx | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mercury | Oldsmobile |
Model | Lynx | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1980 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2680 mm |