1980 Mercury Lynx vs. 1997 Renault Helem

To start off, 1997 Renault Helem is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Renault Helem is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 440 more horse power than 1980 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 1980 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 700 kg more than 1980 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1997 Renault Helem is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Renault Helem. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mercury Lynx (121 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 1980 Mercury Lynx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.

Compare all specifications: