1980 Mercury Lynx vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1980 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU should accelerate faster than 1980 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 955 kg more than 1980 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mercury Lynx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (240 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mercury Lynx | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
Make | Mercury | Mitsubishi |
Model | Lynx | SSU |
Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2570 mm |