1980 Mercury Lynx vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 2 (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1980 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1980 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 2 weights approximately 96 kg more than 1980 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 2 (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mercury Lynx | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Mercury | Mazda |
Model | Lynx | 2 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1046 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2489 mm |