1980 Mini Clubman vs. 2012 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2012 Smart ForTwo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mini Clubman would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mini Clubman is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Smart ForTwo has automatic transmission and 1980 Mini Clubman has manual transmission. 1980 Mini Clubman will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Smart ForTwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mini Clubman | 2012 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Mini | Smart |
Model | Clubman | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 71 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automated manual |