1980 Mini MK IV vs. 1951 Riley RM A
To start off, 1980 Mini MK IV is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,495 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Riley RM A weights approximately 625 kg more than 1980 Mini MK IV.
Because 1951 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mini MK IV | 1951 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Mini | Riley |
| Model | MK IV | RM A |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2870 mm |
