1980 Mini MK IV vs. 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4
To start off, 1980 Mini MK IV is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 2,138 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 (104 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1980 Mini MK IV. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 should accelerate faster than 1980 Mini MK IV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 weights approximately 405 kg more than 1980 Mini MK IV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mini MK IV | 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 | |
| Make | Mini | Triumph |
| Model | MK IV | Dove GTR4 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 2138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2140 mm |
