1980 Mini MK IV vs. 1999 Acura EL
To start off, 1999 Acura EL is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mini MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mini MK IV would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura EL (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1980 Mini MK IV. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1980 Mini MK IV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura EL weights approximately 469 kg more than 1980 Mini MK IV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Acura EL (145 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mini MK IV. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1999 Acura EL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mini MK IV.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mini MK IV | 1999 Acura EL | |
Make | Mini | Acura |
Model | MK IV | EL |
Year Released | 1980 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 61 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1079 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1704 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2619 mm |