1980 Mini MK IV vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mini MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mini MK IV would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (73 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1980 Mini MK IV. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1980 Mini MK IV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Clio weights approximately 290 kg more than 1980 Mini MK IV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Clio (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mini MK IV. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2002 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mini MK IV.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mini MK IV | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mini | Renault |
Model | MK IV | Clio |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 61 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2480 mm |