1980 Mini MK IV vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mini MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mini MK IV would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1980 Mini MK IV. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1980 Mini MK IV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mini MK IV. (61 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mini MK IV.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mini MK IV | 2006 Holden Epica | |
Make | Mini | Holden |
Model | MK IV | Epica |
Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 61 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |