1980 Mini MK IV vs. 2006 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2006 Toyota Sienna is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mini MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mini MK IV would be higher. At 3,308 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Sienna (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1980 Mini MK IV. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 1980 Mini MK IV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Sienna (301 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mini MK IV. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Sienna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mini MK IV. 2006 Toyota Sienna has automatic transmission and 1980 Mini MK IV has manual transmission. 1980 Mini MK IV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Toyota Sienna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mini MK IV | 2006 Toyota Sienna | |
Make | Mini | Toyota |
Model | MK IV | Sienna |
Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3308 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 61 Nm | 301 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3040 mm |