1980 Mini MK IV vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mini MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mini MK IV would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Clio (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1980 Mini MK IV. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1980 Mini MK IV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Clio (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mini MK IV. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mini MK IV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mini MK IV | 2010 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mini | Renault |
| Model | MK IV | Clio |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 61 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2480 mm |
