1980 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1958 Talbot 2500
To start off, 1980 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Talbot 2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Talbot 2500 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Talbot 2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Talbot 2500 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1958 Talbot 2500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Talbot 2500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mitsubishi Colt | 1958 Talbot 2500 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Talbot |
| Model | Colt | 2500 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1958 |
| Engine Size | 1242 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2510 mm |
