1980 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1960 Seat 600
To start off, 1980 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,242 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 235 kg more than 1960 Seat 600.
Because 1960 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mitsubishi Colt | 1960 Seat 600 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Seat |
Model | Colt | 600 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 19 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2010 mm |