1980 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1990 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1990 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,366 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 790 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1990 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mitsubishi Colt | 1990 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Colt | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1980 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 2366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 112 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2630 mm |