1980 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1997 Lincoln Mark VIII
To start off, 1997 Lincoln Mark VIII is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Lincoln Mark VIII is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Lincoln Mark VIII weights approximately 2947 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1997 Lincoln Mark VIII is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Lincoln Mark VIII. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Lincoln Mark VIII has automatic transmission and 1980 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Lincoln Mark VIII will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mitsubishi Colt | 1997 Lincoln Mark VIII | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Lincoln |
Model | Colt | Mark VIII |
Year Released | 1980 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 280 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 3757 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 5263 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1361 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2870 mm |