1980 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2004 Opel Tigra
To start off, 2004 Opel Tigra is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Opel Tigra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Opel Tigra weights approximately 425 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mitsubishi Colt | 2004 Opel Tigra | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Opel |
Model | Colt | Tigra |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2500 mm |