1980 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Clio weights approximately 606 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2004 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mitsubishi Colt | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Colt | Clio |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 251 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1416 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2480 mm |