1980 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Rover 75 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rover 75 weights approximately 750 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Rover 75 has automatic transmission and 1980 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Rover 75 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mitsubishi Colt | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Rover |
Model | Colt | 75 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2750 mm |