1980 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2012 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2012 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1186 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2012 Toyota 4Runner is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Toyota 4Runner. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 1980 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mitsubishi Colt | 2012 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Colt | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1242 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1996 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4823 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1816 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2789 mm |
