1980 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Minica. (29 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 1980 Mitsubishi Minica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mitsubishi Minica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mitsubishi Minica. (40 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mitsubishi Minica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mitsubishi Minica | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Holden |
| Model | Minica | Epica |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 546 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 29 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2700 mm |
