1980 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma (86 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma (145 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | Sigma | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2540 mm |
