1980 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma (75 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 175 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Zastava |
| Model | Sigma | 850 K |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2010 mm |
