1980 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 1985 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1985 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Plymouth Sundance (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. (86 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 145 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | 1985 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Plymouth |
Model | Sigma | Sundance |
Year Released | 1980 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2470 mm |