1980 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 1996 Zagato Bravo
To start off, 1996 Zagato Bravo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher.
Because 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Zagato Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Zagato Bravo has automatic transmission and 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma has manual transmission. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Zagato Bravo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | 1996 Zagato Bravo | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Zagato |
Model | Sigma | Bravo |
Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |