1980 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2010 Ford Ka

To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma (86 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ka. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Ka weights approximately 25 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma.

Because 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 145 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications:

1980 Mitsubishi Sigma 2010 Ford Ka
Make Mitsubishi Ford
Model Sigma Ka
Year Released 1980 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 1247 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 86 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 145 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 1500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 1055 kg
Vehicle Length 4460 mm 3630 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2520 mm 2310 mm