1980 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2011 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2011 Holden Cruze is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,554 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. (98 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma (188 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2011 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Holden |
| Model | Sigma | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2554 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 188 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2685 mm |
