1980 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,554 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot RCZ (156 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. (98 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Peugeot RCZ has automatic transmission and 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma has manual transmission. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Peugeot RCZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Peugeot |
| Model | Sigma | RCZ |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2554 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 156 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4287 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1359 mm |
