1980 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Cooper weights approximately 235 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Cooper (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. (145 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Cooper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Mini |
Model | Sigma | Cooper |
Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1426 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2547 mm |