1980 Morgan 4 vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1980 Morgan 4. (85 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1980 Morgan 4.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Morgan 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Morgan 4. (135 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Morgan 4.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Morgan 4 | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Morgan | Mazda |
| Model | 4 | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 180 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3010 mm |
