1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1964 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1980 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 393 kg more than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Reliant Sabre Six (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1964 Reliant Sabre Six will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Nissan Bluebird | 1964 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Nissan | Reliant |
Model | Bluebird | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 1980 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1951 cc | 2552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 797 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2290 mm |