1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1965 Seat 1500
To start off, 1980 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Nissan Bluebird (120 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1965 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1965 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 110 kg more than 1965 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Nissan Bluebird | 1965 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Nissan | Seat |
Model | Bluebird | 1500 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2660 mm |