1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1980 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Nissan Bluebird (59 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 416 kg more than 1968 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Nissan Bluebird (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (72 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1980 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Nissan Bluebird | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Nissan | ZAZ |
| Model | Bluebird | 966 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1951 cc | 1196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 38 HP |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 72 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2170 mm |
