1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1976 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1980 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Nissan Bluebird (59 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1976 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1976 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 500 kg more than 1976 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Nissan Bluebird (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volkswagen Polo. (57 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1980 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Nissan Bluebird | 1976 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Nissan | Volkswagen |
| Model | Bluebird | Polo |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1951 cc | 895 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 39 HP |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 57 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 690 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2340 mm |
